Asrock Z270 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 620
61% 501 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 2438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 59.6
56% 64.7 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 68.4
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 281 191 126 108 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 565
Mixed 586
SusWrite 193
120% 539 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 51
189% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 326
268% 374 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 157%
HP S700 250GB-$46
233GB free
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 424 430 430 438 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 411
Mixed 349
SusWrite 420
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 20.1
131% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 31
77% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 98%
HP S700 120GB-$30
112GB free
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 185 189 190 189 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 359
Write 312
Mixed 280
SusWrite 184
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 14.4
96% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 18.9
47% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 95%
HP S700 120GB-$30
112GB free
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 186 189 189 188 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 340
Write 315
Mixed 275
SusWrite 184
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 15
90% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 81.6
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 18.6
47% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
648GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 158 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 176
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 159
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 24.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Taichi Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback