Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '19 at 22:04
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 86.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 840 85% 687 Pts	64-Core 941 58% 941 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 141 Parallax 119 104% 129 fps	MRender 99.3 Gravity 127 Splatting 108 91% 111 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,894 Write 1,314 Mixed 493 270% 1,233 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 50.6 225% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,046 DQ Write 1039 DQ Mixed 1,007 766% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 148GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1317 314 303 302 305 306 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1,954 Write 1,206 Mixed 516 SusWrite 475 228% 1,038 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 60.1 240% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,101 DQ Write 1,140 DQ Mixed 715 649% 985 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 236%
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 69GB free Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 420 486 489 489 489 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 483 Mixed 337 SusWrite 470 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 58.1 206% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 340 261% 354 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 118%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 364 363 361 361 360 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 480 Write 355 Mixed 246 SusWrite 362 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 15.3 118% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 89.6 109% 186 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 123GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 138 138 138 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 136 Mixed 77 SusWrite 137 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 114%
Seagate M3 1TB 2,563 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 8GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 41 41 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 37 Write 38.7 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 40.1 28% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.9 223% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 64%
Essentiel B 2TB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 251GB free Firmware: 60A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 71 73 82 82 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 140 Write 143 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 76.5 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 78%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 29GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 66.7 Write 52.5 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 50.3 68% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3.5 227% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 4x8GB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 24.7 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16