Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 182 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 354 48% 355 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	8.82% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 8.19 9% 9.95 fps	MRender 9.14 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 12 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 95 64 65 63 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 437 Write 129 Mixed 164 SusWrite 78.8 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 28.3 110% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 152 133% 207 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 57GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 110 89 90 117 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 175 Write 153 Mixed 106 SusWrite 106 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 7.4 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16