Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X7800 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	40% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 29.9 2-Core 59.5 37% 53.4 Pts	4-Core 58.3 8-Core 57.8 8% 58 Pts	64-Core 59.7 4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Familia Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset 201 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0136) 384MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	0.18% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.21 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.18% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80 7,190 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: M2CR010 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 251 Write 229 Mixed 229 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 29.1 96% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 162 119% 154 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 540IntelBench 26%, 293 samples	3x
Celeron 550IntelBench 27%, 384 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	2x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	9x
Mobile Intel 965 Express ChipsetFamiliaBench 0%, 201 samples	1x
1.8b for Mobile Intel 965ChellBench 0%, 51 samples	1x

SSD
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16