Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 88.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 909 83% 694 Pts	64-Core 1281 79% 1281 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700 4,268 User benchmarks, average bench 94% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 1045 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 98.4 Parallax 206 94% 140 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 144 Splatting 142 106% 128 fps
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,022 Write 1315 Mixed 651 292% 1,330 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 56.4 227% 84 MB/s	DQ Read 1,018 DQ Write 578 DQ Mixed 826 607% 807 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 17GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 85 91 87 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 80.8 Write 103 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 84.6 58% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 75%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 14GB free, PID 1000, TRANSCEND 16GB USB 2.0 JetFlash 310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.8 3.6 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Read 9.3 Write 7.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 4.4 12% 8.78 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown=> F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 37.5 119% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 40.9 SC Mixed 32.8 96% 33.6 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16