User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGBT___ AWRDACPI
MotherboardGigabyte 8PE667
Memory0.7 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20021202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 14:53
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 48.3
1-Core 33
2-Core 33.5
27% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 33.8
8-Core 33.9
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 32.8
2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y080L0 82GB-$60
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 18 20 15 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 16.4
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 14.9
11% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
94GB free
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 22 30 21 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 19.8
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.82% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.6
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback