Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 74 2-Core 147 58% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 291 33% 257 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 120 Parallax 101 87% 109 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 106 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 179 165 153 155 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 448 Mixed 377 SusWrite 189 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 53 170% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 349 265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 124%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1A 256GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 221GB free Firmware: M506 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 402 397 390 402 403 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 410 Write 396 Mixed 302 SusWrite 400 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 42.6 153% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 233 207% 312 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 102%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 190 192 189 191 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0-CH9 8x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.6% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16