HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Laptop 14-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 831D
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 15:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
1-Core 61
2-Core 106
40% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 161
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 159
11% 159 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon 520
HP(103C 831D) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.12024.10
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 31
4% 17.8 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 0.1
5% 11 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC86201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 344 350 332 356 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 444
Write 342
Mixed 231
SusWrite 348
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 11.6
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 204
182% 275 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Adata 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Laptop 14-bs0xx Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback