Asus Maximus II Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Maximus II Formula  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 86.4
48% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 150
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
BFG(19F1 0F39) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 5.94
10% 9.5 fps
MRender 9.71
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 7.26
7% 9.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 108 77 97 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 134
Write 104
Mixed 148
SusWrite 92.2
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 46.6
50% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba HDWD130 802GB
3TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 141 142 140 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 139
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 139
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
309GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 93 97 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 98
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 94
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 20 21 18 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 20
Mixed 10
SusWrite 19.7
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus II Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $624
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback