Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 10:21
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 472
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 57.8
48% 60.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 51.9
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 345 365 371 371 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 365
Mixed 322
SusWrite 362
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 44.4
164% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 196
175% 261 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
58GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 196 152 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76% Very good
Read 262
Write 250
Mixed 226
SusWrite 186
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 39.8
148% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 142
120% 176 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 188 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 143
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 190
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 500GB
239GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 38
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 42.2
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Packard Bell Carbon 1TB
223GB free, PID 0017
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 36.8
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 37.3
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback