Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 442
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 39.9
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 27
Splatting 35
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 132 125 101 126 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 263
Write 191
Mixed 196
SusWrite 122
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 22.5
88% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 129
97% 128 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
122GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 38 12 24 38 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 60
Write 66.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 45.4
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 59%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 39
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 5.3
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 128GB-$13
17GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 17 26 29 39 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 134
Write 77.9
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 37
105% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.6
132% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 41%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 38.1
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 70%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
229GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 40
Write 37.7
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 37.1
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback