Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y71 3,052 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 42.5 34% 46.5 Pts	4-Core 57.1 8-Core 76.2 8% 66.6 Pts	64-Core 95.3 6% 95.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 390E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 2.28 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT L8T-256L9G 256GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: H886201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 251 268 282 304 329 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 391 Write 332 Mixed 247 SusWrite 281 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 15.8 63% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 110 92% 135 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	13x
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	5x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	18x

SSD
IT L8T-128L9G 128GBLiteonBench 75%, 711 samples	5x
MZNTE128HMGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 150 samples	3x
MZNTE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 67%, 1,123 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16