Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 20:52
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.1% Very good
1-Core 117
2-Core 190
75% 154 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 706
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 990
66% 990 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Asus(1043 0403) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 18.7
6% 19.7 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 13.6
4% 14.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 171 167 164 162 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 473
Mixed 337
SusWrite 198
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 48.1
160% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 342
264% 359 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
90GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 68
Write 68.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 62.9
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2015)-$160
5.5TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 192 186 174 192 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 100
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 182
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
95GB free, PID 0470
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 39
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 38.9
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $491
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $645SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback