Asus M4A785-M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A785-M (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100414
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9850 2,080 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 36.6 2-Core 73.7 43% 62.7 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 147 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500 5,613 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 038E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 3.56 4% 4.71 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 5.22 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 206 208 208 209 209 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.8% Above average	Read 227 Write 215 Mixed 197 SusWrite 206 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 33.4 107% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.5 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 48.1 38% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 129%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 931GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 18.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 15.6 14% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 800GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 18 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 14.4 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 10 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A785-M Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785-M

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	9x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
360GB 360GBSSDBench 57%, 1,295 samples	3x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16