HP p6604f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 15%
Desktop 26%
Workstation 16%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP p6604f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory1.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 04:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
23% Poor
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 74.9
31% 63 Pts
4-Core 85
8-Core 88.7
12% 86.8 Pts
64-Core 82.8
6% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
EVGA(3842 1441) 1,024MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 12.8
4% 14 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 8.1
15% 27.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 43 59 33 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 107
Write 43.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 47.8
15% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 4.2
23% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 68.1
60% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 TS512MLK64V3N 10GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical p6604f Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6604f

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback