Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '19 at 14:02
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 24 2-Core 43.3 32% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 107 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.5% Above average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 93.8 39% 65.2 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 89.9 Splatting 72.3 73% 92.5 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKGW180A4 180GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC31 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 125 130 124 140 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 306 Write 176 Mixed 211 SusWrite 135 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 22.9 68% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 115 93% 134 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 82%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 13GB free Firmware: K3110310 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 949 Write 246 Mixed 392 115% 529 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 46.4 162% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 197 154% 213 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 665GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 165 172 173 174 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 126 Write 163 Mixed 31 SusWrite 168 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 7,811 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 17 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 101%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $394Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	38x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x

SSD
MEMPEK1W032GA 29GBIntelBench 263%, 1,656 samples	28x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	15x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	14x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	13x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $623

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16