Toshiba SATELLITE L850-12Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850-12Z  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 139
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 174
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.28
6% 6.37 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 5.83
4% 5.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 219 221 218 217 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 286
Write 259
Mixed 333
SusWrite 219
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 21.9
86% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 141
166% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB
1066, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback