Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100624
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 160 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 396 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 1.66 3% 4.16 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 4.57 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 62 17 8.2 29 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.5% Poor	Read 133 Write 71.2 Mixed 89 SusWrite 38.8 18% 83 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 12.5 46% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 12.2 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 17GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 103 108 71 15 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 209 Write 219 Mixed 180 SusWrite 89.3 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 26.2 99% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 31.3 27% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 88%
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 142GB free Firmware: M306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 63 18 8.8 29 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 240 Write 144 Mixed 177 SusWrite 40.2 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 21.7 85% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 24 22% 33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 28GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 58 62 64 64 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19% Very poor	Read 127 Write 78.2 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 59.7 18% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.6 34% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 59GB free Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 58 62 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 196 Write 106 Mixed 132 SusWrite 59.7 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 18 62% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 21 16% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 99GB free Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 124 140 149 175 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 236 Write 114 Mixed 205 SusWrite 144 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 30.4 102% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 35.9 30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 619GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 109 113 115 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 115 Write 88.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 109 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-US3L Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	104x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	13x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	53x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	43x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16