Gigabyte GA-B75-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75-D3V  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 19:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 508
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 21.6
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 19.9
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 187 185 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 209
Write 184
Mixed 131
SusWrite 185
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 19
70% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 22.8
21% 31 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
5GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 37
Write 8.8
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 44.8
19% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 41%
Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB-$45
200GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 69.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 63.7
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.3
153% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
631GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 46 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 145
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 44.8
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 1TB
530GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 19.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 12.2
23% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 43%
WD 5000AAJ External 500GB
19GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 12.2
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75-D3V Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback