Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 22:37
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 166
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 572
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4377
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.91
5% 7.28 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 12.2
7% 8.59 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 230 229 223 225 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 446
Mixed 380
SusWrite 244
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 47
158% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 287
217% 290 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 124%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$225
32GB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 76 75 76 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 130
Write 138
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 68.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$225
32GB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 76 97 90 78 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 83.4
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$225
32GB free
Firmware: 80.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 84 97 106 118 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 131
Write 140
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 100
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback