PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150723 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 20 '19 at 03:17 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Nitro+ 8GB (Connected @ PCIE Gen2)
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 193 205 203 203 MB/s
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
437GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 118 119 119 MB/s
|
67.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-1333C9-4GNS F3-1333C9-4GNS 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 40x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 7x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 4x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $237 |