Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 300 97% 179 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1175 103% 875 Pts	64-Core 1,618 100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 167 Parallax 166 95% 150 fps	MRender 227 Gravity 129 Splatting 108 121% 155 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 854GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1134 1144 1125 1070 1009 1012 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 1,887 Write 1,131 Mixed 1,080 SusWrite 1,082 289% 1,295 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 42.9 130% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,134 DQ Write 914 DQ Mixed 656 591% 901 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 927GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 420 419 409 392 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 448 Write 397 Mixed 396 SusWrite 409 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 30.3 102% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 349 242% 306 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 133%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$112 26,139 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 829GB free Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 413 412 404 386 385 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 373 Mixed 354 SusWrite 402 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 28.5 117% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 297 239% 336 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB 556 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 22.3 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 5,888 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	14x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16