Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 772
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 89.8
55% 73.2 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 77.9
55% 66.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2267 604 599 612 614 614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,240
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 885
398% 1,782 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 92.5
300% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 981
742% 996 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 294%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
2GB free
Firmware: HP35
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61
Write 62
Mixed 51.3
44% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
866GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 23 17 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 16.4
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 20
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback