Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '19 at 22:52
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 5 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47% Average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 129 50% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 334 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	55.8% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 60.8 57% 66.3 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 64.7 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 729 593 476 478 477 475 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 87GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 54.7 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 53.7 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 172 173 172 172 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 134 Mixed 76 SusWrite 168 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 734GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 167 166 168 164 166 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 132 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 164 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.2% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 22.7 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16