Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.2% Above average
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 161
56% 119 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 639
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,138
76% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Lighting 241
Reflection 217
Parallax 240
74% 233 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 229
Splatting 158
80% 186 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$108
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 386 374 375 361 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 414
Write 387
Mixed 360
SusWrite 372
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 26.6
81% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 292
226% 308 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
82GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 216 216 216 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.6% Good
Read 253
Write 243
Mixed 227
SusWrite 217
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 40.4
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 172
135% 186 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 126%
WD Re 2TB-$46
350GB free
Firmware: 1D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50% Average
Read 84.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 88.8
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
393GB free
Firmware: A33B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 63.5
Write 78.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 76.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 71%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$140
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 108 113 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 110
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 112%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B0 2TB
361GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 100 101 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 82.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 99
114% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
124% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
335GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 61
Write 87.7
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 99.2
108% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 51%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
491GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 97
Write 117
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 0.1
86% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 57%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
160GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 83.7
Write 102
Mixed 46
SusWrite 0.1
74% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 57%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 64GB
58GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 63 63 63 63 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 88.5
Write 54.7
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 58.1
72% 58 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 3
148% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 25.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 2,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $103
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback