Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 663
59% 499 Pts
64-Core 1,164
72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 75
66% 79.7 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 68.6
61% 75.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 386 374 375 361 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 414
Write 387
Mixed 360
SusWrite 372
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 26.6
81% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 292
226% 308 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
82GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 216 216 216 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.6% Good
Read 253
Write 243
Mixed 227
SusWrite 217
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 40.4
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 172
135% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 126%
WD Re 2TB-$28
350GB free
Firmware: 1D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50% Average
Read 84.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 88.8
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
393GB free
Firmware: A33B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 63.5
Write 78.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 76.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 70%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 108 113 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 110
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 111%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B0 2TB
361GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 82.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 99
114% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
124% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
335GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 61
Write 87.7
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 99.2
108% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 51%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
491GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 97
Write 117
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 0.1
86% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 56%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
160GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 83.7
Write 102
Mixed 46
SusWrite 0.1
74% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 56%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 64GB
58GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 63 63 63 63 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 88.5
Write 54.7
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 58.1
72% 58 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 3
148% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 25.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback