Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 134
2-Core 229
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 694
68% 559 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 192
Parallax 188
142% 184 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 174
Splatting 128
116% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 296 304 304 308 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 300
Mixed 313
SusWrite 304
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 42.2
174% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 248
211% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Mushkin ECO2 240GB-$109
57GB free
Firmware: 606ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 153 158 160 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 341
Write 240
Mixed 277
SusWrite 160
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 40.3
157% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 120
115% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
898GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 165 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 127
Mixed 85
SusWrite 164
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38
830GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 136 135 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 136
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
120GB free, PID 1000, Samsung Fit Plus
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 117%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB
11GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.3 3 0.3 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 3.1
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
95% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback