Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110608
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 345
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.4
83% 103 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 97
Splatting 101
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 244 246 250 252 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 331
Write 236
Mixed 196
SusWrite 246
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 29
101% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 143
109% 147 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 309 309 308 309 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 458
Mixed 381
SusWrite 323
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 46.4
149% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 364
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
7GB free
Firmware: CT100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 29 32 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 30
Write 19
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 30.7
17% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback