Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 17:52
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7500-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.8% Average
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 51.7
19% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 253
46% 315 Pts
64-Core 304
20% 304 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$240
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 193
Reflection 186
Parallax 180
51% 186 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 106
Splatting 148
33% 130 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$33
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 76 76 73 56 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 392
Write 92
Mixed 172
SusWrite 72.9
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 17.4
88% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 15.7
48% 103 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 70%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$76
51GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 293 298 284 140 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 307
Write 396
Mixed 284
SusWrite 238
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 5.9
84% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 191
132% 165 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$70
564GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 155 163 161 112 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 169
Mixed 39
SusWrite 141
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 9,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $375
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback