PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181019 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Mar 31 '19 at 18:06 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$459
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
|
96.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 70 62 55 53 53 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Intel 330 Series 60GB
9GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 66 64 63 74 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
215GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 130 131 131 131 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
141GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 47 46 44 43 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 5,423x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 5,183x |
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,352x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 1,493x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,305x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 1,112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $1,278 |