Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3745 428 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 51 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 35.2 25% 34.6 Pts	4-Core 70.1 8-Core 69.9 9% 70 Pts	64-Core 71.6 4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.84 1% 0.91 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.11 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.6% Poor	Read 162 Write 61.7 Mixed 87.7 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 4.23 38% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 4.42 7% 12.5 MB/s

Generic SD128 SD Card 125GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 17GB free Firmware: 3.0 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 16.5 Mixed 18 14% 19 MB/s	4K Read 2.53 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.72 203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16