Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 81.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 454 61% 455 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 139F) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 32.4 27% 32.6 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 30.7 26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 113 62 63 65 63 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 312 Write 248 Mixed 238 SusWrite 102 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 81.9 4K Mixed 30 130% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 162 140% 203 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 174 174 174 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 167 Mixed 106 SusWrite 173 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB 703 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 28GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 13 18 13 17 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 3.8 Mixed 12 SusWrite 14.5 17% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 18,648 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 17.6 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	867x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	715x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	543x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	454x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	403x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16