HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82EE
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '19 at 10:15
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.1% Poor
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 98.7
32% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 170
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 199
13% 199 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 82EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4526
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 10.9
3% 10.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 13.2
3% 10.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 360
Write 347
Mixed 331
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 16.2
76% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 158
148% 229 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung K4BDG1646Q-HYKO 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $60
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $207
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback