Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW199
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120430
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 03:09
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450 442 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 81.9 41% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 342 30% 256 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 81 77 85 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 183 Write 118 Mixed 148 SusWrite 85.3 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 27.2 94% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 130 102% 141 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 55%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 90GB 648 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 23GB free Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 119 125 122 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 142 Write 126 Mixed 129 SusWrite 120 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 24.9 89% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 117 91% 124 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 104GB free Firmware: A3FE SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 85 85 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 84.7 Write 81 Mixed 45.6 SusWrite 84.3 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.1 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 9.8 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 3.4 12% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.3 153% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.6% Poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.9 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	49x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	18x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16