Oegstone DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 158
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 428
45% 359 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 34.7
0% 21.4 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
115GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 24 178 149 118 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 414
Write 338
Mixed 298
SusWrite 122
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 10.7
57% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 44
47% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 127 140 148 91 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 132
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 107%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 1TB
834GB free, PID 60c6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 93
Write 53
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 93.9
94% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback