User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 172B
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5 M 540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.8% Below average
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 103
40% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 143
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 134
9% 134 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
HP(103C 172B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 0.8
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.4
1% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$36
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 52 53 53 58 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 57.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 53
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback