Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Z87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140529
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 332 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 6.31 Parallax 6.19 3% 5.49 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.52 5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 35.1 Parallax 28.5 31% 33.9 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 33.6 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 433 Write 424 Mixed 321 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 46 158% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.5 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 147 128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 8GB free Firmware: X2316RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 270 Mixed 220 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 31.3 129% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 43.2 69% 131 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 91%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 27GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 65 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 69.3 Mixed 55 SusWrite 65.5 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 87%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 67GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 76.8 Write 71.3 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 74.7 50% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	13x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $367

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16