Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 01:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4590-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69.8% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
73% 156 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 369
53% 383 Pts
64-Core 385
26% 385 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
PNY(196E 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 64.2
17% 58.3 fps
MRender 52.8
Gravity 67
Splatting 39
19% 52.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$95
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 99 102 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 338
Write 120
Mixed 166
SusWrite 99.3
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 30.6
116% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 122
88% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$35
519GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 176 177 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 152
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 176
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
184GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 42.3
52% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $543
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback