PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Boot Drive | 34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung RV409/RV509/RV709 (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG RV409/RV509/RV709 |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121127 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 16 '19 at 16:14 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.3%
Average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 169 162 141 123 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 160GB
83GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 21 20 MB/s
|
9.67%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
21.9%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 15x |
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 12x |
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 26x |
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $200 |