Jumper EZbook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemJumper EZbook  (all builds)
MotherboardJumper P313P
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 19:39
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
SC Int 46.6
SC Float 43.3
SC Mixed 45.5
36% 45.1 Pts
QC Int 173
QC Float 167
QC Mixed 174
39% 172 Pts
MC Int 175
MC Float 168
MC Mixed 168
26% 170 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.9
2% 7 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 13.5
4% 9.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB
54GB free
Firmware: T180517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 33 28 21 32 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 335
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 39.4
25% 108 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 5.7
16% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 31%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical EZbook Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Jumper EZbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $84
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $213Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback