PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds) |
Memory | 29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 20 '19 at 20:54 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 257 209 86 69 65 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
107GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 79 78 76 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
683GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 74 72 74 MB/s
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
436GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 90 90 90 91 MB/s
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
TDK LoR TF10 16GB
14GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3 2.8 3.2 3.3 3.1 MB/s
|
2.81%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1632 MHz
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 1,398x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 542x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 293x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 454x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 220x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 181x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $648 |