Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 K 655 401 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 106 47% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 136 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.ADA SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 14 17 21 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 57.2 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 18.2 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 42%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 7GB free, PID 004d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.7 5 5.1 5.1 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 4.8 8% 7.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Kingston K1N7HK-ELC NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Kingston K1N7HK-ELC 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22% Poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,038x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16