PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150528 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 24 '19 at 06:58 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 37 16 94 86 69 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
93GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 9.6 8.7 8.7 9 MB/s
|
6.19%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Passport 1TB
55GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 19 17 19 18 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |