Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 828
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 220
Parallax 233
172% 221 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 204
Splatting 123
152% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,631
Write 5,752
Mixed 6,170
1,380% 6,184 MB/s
4K Read 615
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 349
1,517% 408 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 754
608% 868 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
157GB free
Firmware: R050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 450 300 248 246 247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 318
Write 449
Mixed 356
SusWrite 322
82% 361 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 36.5
141% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 176
176% 282 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 99%
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$90
127GB free
Firmware: 2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 181 183 182 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.4% Good
Read 262
Write 183
Mixed 132
SusWrite 181
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 26.6
123% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 182
148% 211 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
551GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 73
Write 71.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 67.8
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 24.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback