HP 600-1315xt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP 600-1315xt  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A9A
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 22:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5 M 460-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.2% Poor
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 108
37% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 142
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 903A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 296.19
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 1.1
1% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.6
1% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$80
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 56.2
Write 64.5
Mixed 45.8
42% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
CE8 M471B5273CH0-CH9 FE02 EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 600-1315xt Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation 17%

System: HP 600-1315xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $110
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback