Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 206 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 203 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake) 16,316 User benchmarks, average bench 3% ASRock(1849 1902) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 3.03 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 3 2% 3.5 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 2.97 Splatting 8.26 5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 92 93 103 116 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 414 Write 360 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 123 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 0.7 33% 9.43 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 48.3 62% 112 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V23D4LF4GB5282682133 Samsung ZION-4GBDDR4PC2400 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.8% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 20.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	199x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	107x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	125x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	90x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	59x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16