Asus X99-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
96% 205 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 813
86% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,029
69% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1474 MHz, MLim: 1848 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 225
Reflection 206
Parallax 231
58% 221 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 214
Splatting 150
57% 177 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 655 649 655 656 651 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 2,348
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 846
404% 1,809 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 71.6
261% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 898
652% 854 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 270%
Great: 326%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$127
894GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 403 396 320 279 277 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 398
Mixed 306
SusWrite 349
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.6
172% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 208
191% 295 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Toshiba HG6 256GB
164GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 411 414 425 430 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 472
Mixed 454
SusWrite 420
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 46.7
151% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 342
256% 341 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
155GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 373 375 386 391 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 491
Write 386
Mixed 270
SusWrite 381
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 17.9
91% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 108
119% 194 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 42.9
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 24.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 114%
Great: 146%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $943
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback