| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Foxconn H61MXL-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120917 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 28 '19 at 19:55 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.7%
Average
|
55% 91.5 Pts
|
17% 127 Pts
|
6% 93.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
10% 14.8 fps
|
12% 14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 72 26 14 134 104 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
30% 135 MB/s
|
43% 13.6 MB/s
|
37% 66.4 MB/s
|
|
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 4.7 5 5.7 5.7 6.1 MB/s
|
6.95%
Terrible
|
20% 16.1 MB/s
|
53% 1.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.1%
Below average
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
45% 88.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MXL-K Builds (Compare 66 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXL-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 9x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |