PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 30 '19 at 07:40 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
42%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 460 459 460 460 MB/s
|
99.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.7%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 150x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 165x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 111x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |