Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E-10G WS  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 08:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 97
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 709
65% 544 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Nvidia(10DE 047A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.38
1% 1 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 286 286 287 288 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 474
Mixed 450
SusWrite 293
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 54.8
182% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.8
7% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 8%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
248GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 48.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 82.3
83% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback