PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw6600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A9Ch |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081015 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | May 03 '19 at 21:07 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 143 107 100 94 41 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
618GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 107 107 109 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 45 45 45 45 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 569 samples | 15x |
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $139 |